Empirical selection of a clipped-vote predictor #
Fresh labeled vote samples estimate each dyadic candidate's prediction probability.
selectSlope returns a natural numerator for use by clippedPredict; the analytic lower-tail
cutoff is never supplied to the program. The error bound combines the lower-tail argument,
slope discretization, and empirical selection with explicit losses.
Main definitions #
clippedTrial,selectSlope: validate and select a finite dyadic candidate.Parameters.predictionInverseTolerance,.predictionGridBound: explicit polynomial budgets.
Main results #
isPPTOn_selectSlope: charge the complete grid search and its fresh validation samples.selectSlope_dense_margin,State.Successful.selectSlope_advantage: transfer the loop's dense-margin guarantee to the selected predictor.
References #
[Hol05], Lemma 2.4 and Claim 2.15. Empirical selection over a finite slope grid replaces
estimating the analytic cutoff directly.
Adapted from the cslib crypto branch at 5ff69ca93402e7c947208dc56396d6d86203ccd8.
A certified training sampler and efficient parameters give a strict PPT correctness trial.
Selecting a clipped predictor is uniformly strict PPT, including the complete grid search.
Polynomial inverse tolerance for selecting a predictor, also bounding its final advantage.
Instances For
A polynomial slope grid fine enough for the maximum possible vote margin.
Instances For
The selection tolerance is computed from the encoded parameter record.
The slope grid is polynomial in the encoded parameter record.
Explicit polynomial precisions leave an inverse-polynomial advantage after both rounding and empirical selection. The bound deliberately leaves slack for the later reduction.
The same inverse-polynomial advantage also holds on the majority stopping branch.
The executable trial's success probability is one minus the clipped prediction error.
Except with one estimation failure per grid point, the selected predictor is within twice the tolerance of every dyadic candidate.
The empirically selected executable predictor inherits the dense-margin advantage, with explicit dyadic rounding and sampling losses.
On the dense-margin branch of a successful clocked run, empirical selection produces the final clipped predictor with the boosting advantage and explicit approximation losses.
With the explicit polynomial grid and tolerance, the final predictor beats δ / 2 by an
inverse-polynomial amount. Only the supplied confidence controls selection failure.